Archive for the ‘buddha’ Category

Mahayana Origination   2 comments


The Mahayana Buddhism, a sect, must have come initially, the origination or who has true faith based on the Mahanama Sutta and the ‘Faith is kept First’. This is my hypothesis. I personally don’t believe in ‘..ism’ thing as Buddha’s words are universal means applies to everyone, everything, and no need to sect it. No one should necessarily claim that you are Buddhist. But do not limit yourself in such any sects which was later devised from their little, incapable thoughts. Buddha’s all words are beyond the capacity of those who disected buddha and developed a piece and made personalized sects. It is universal, not personalized. Keep doing vipasana meditation.

“Mahanama Sutta: Being a Lay Buddhist” (AN 8.25), translated from the Pali by Kumara Bhikkhu. Access to Insight (BCBS Edition), 30 November 2013.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an08/an08.025.kuma.html .

—————————————————————————————————————————————-

Once the Blessed One was dwelling among the Sakyas in Nigrodha Park at Kapilavatthu. There, Mahanama the Sakyan approached the Blessed One. Having approached and paid respect to the Blessed One, he sat aside. Then, seated aside, Mahanama the Sakyan said thus to the Blessed One:

“Venerable sir, in what way is one a lay follower?”[1]

“Mahanama, inasmuch as one has gone to the Buddha for refuge, has gone to the Dhamma for refuge, has gone to the Sangha for refuge; in that way, Mahanama, one is a lay follower.”

“Then, venerable sir, in what way is a lay follower virtuous?”

“Mahanama, inasmuch as a lay follower abstains from destroying living beings; abstains from taking what is not given; abstains from sexual misconduct; abstains from lying; and abstains from wine, liquor and intoxicants that are causes for heedlessness; in that way, Mahanama, a lay follower is virtuous.”

“Then, venerable sir, in what way is a lay follower engaged in his own welfare, but not in others’ welfare?”

“Mahanama, inasmuch as a lay follower is possessed of faith himself, but rouses not others to possess faith; is possessed of virtue himself, but rouses not others to possess virtue; is possessed of liberality himself, but rouses not others to possess liberality; is himself desirous of meeting with monks, but rouses not others to meet with monks; is himself desirous of hearing the true Dhamma, but rouses not others to hear the true Dhamma; is himself habitually mindful of the Dhamma that is heard, but rouses not others to be mindful of the Dhamma; has himself ascertained the meaning/benefit of the Dhamma that is heard, but rouses not others to ascertain the meaning/benefit; having known the meaning/benefit, having known the Dhamma, is himself committed to the practice according to the Dhamma, but rouses not others to be committed to the practice according to the Dhamma; in that way, Mahanama, a lay follower is engaged in his own welfare, but not in others’ welfare.”

“Then, venerable sir, in what way is a lay follower engaged in his own welfare and in others’ welfare?”

“Mahanama, inasmuch as a lay follower is possessed of faith himself, and rouses others to possess faith; is possessed of virtue himself, and rouses others to possess virtue; is possessed of liberality himself, and rouses others to possess liberality; is himself desirous of meeting with monks, and rouses others to meet with monks; is himself desirous of hearing the true Dhamma, and rouses others to hear the true Dhamma; is himself habitually mindful of the Dhamma that is heard, and rouses others to be mindful of the Dhamma; is himself ascertained of the meaning/benefit of the Dhamma that is heard, and rouses others to ascertain the meaning/benefit; having known the meaning/benefit, having known the Dhamma, is himself committed to the practice according to the Dhamma, and rouses others to be committed to the practice according to the Dhamma; in that way, Mahanama, a lay follower is engaged in his own welfare and in others’ welfare.”

Advertisements

Buddha-Nirvana   Leave a comment


Whole world wonder, Why buddha didn’t talk much about NIRVANA state?
Why there are not many suttas (sutra) on NIBANNA ?

After all, he laid out all the foundations and stairs towards NIBANNA, he didn’t speak much because, Nibanna state is he himself appeared there, the output is he himself. Look at Buddha, that is NIRVANA, THE NIBANNA. The full proof is here in the bodily form, mental form, behavioral form, such is a NIBANNA. Whole NIBANNA is in a human form.

So, he thought he doesn’t need to explain it. He knew, ‘The Later stage of the Day’ will find an answer.

Posted June 18, 2017 by arjunlimbu in buddha, Uncategorized

Tagged with , , , ,

%d bloggers like this: